|
|
Our approach focused on providing day-to-day hands-on support using customized methods and training. The purpose was two-fold. First to model effective quality improvement behaviors so participants would see what CIP looks like; and second to lead the client's staff via hands-on training through the CIP process so they would understand what successful change implementation feels like. We first worked with a small group of pilot participants, who then assumed leadership roles to direct their own project teams through the CIP efforts. In this approach, we then focused all project teams on reviewing and re-engineering key transaction processes and their related policies, procedures, and systems to reduce costs and eliminate the occurrence of errors. Also, definitions of "quality" were reassessed to assure that measurement efforts and standards were in line with the desired customer service goals. Results Over the course of 13 months, we worked with 26 self-directed teams that defined more than 400 implementation projects. In all, more than 100 employee teams worked on implementation projects. Operational improvements identified and implemented by the CIP teams produced the following results:
DPA . . . Articles | Case Studies | News Releases |
© 2001 Daniel Penn Associates. All Rights Reserved. |